Opinion

Judge Jeanine: Tesla Attacks Are “Domestic Terrorism” and Must Be Prosecuted

Published

March 22, 2025

Appearing on The Ingraham Angle, Judge Jeanine Pirro delivered a scathing takedown of recent violence and threats directed at Tesla, Elon Musk, and Tesla owners across the country. She warned that the campaign—carried out by self-described anti-capitalist activists—amounts to more than protest.

“This is domestic terrorism—I call it Tesla terrorism,” Pirro said. “They’re doxxing car owners, targeting jobs, and threatening violence. These are un-American tactics designed to intimidate civilians and destroy a private company.”

Pirro highlighted the hypocrisy of Democrats who’ve long spoken out against domestic extremism, yet are now silent when groups openly promote attacks on Tesla infrastructure and vehicles. She noted that 13 Democratic lawmakers who had previously sponsored domestic terrorism legislation refused to comment when asked about these attacks.

“This Should Fall Under RICO”

When asked about a Philadelphia-based group reportedly “happy” about recent Tesla arson attacks, Pirro didn’t hold back. She cited their online recommendations to use stronger explosives and detailed instructions on where to place them on Tesla vehicles.

“They better hope nobody ends up maimed or murdered,” she said. “As a former prosecutor, I would cast a wide net—conspiracy charges, aiding and abetting, inciting violence. Anyone involved gets pulled in.”

Pirro believes the attacks rise to the level of organized crime and could qualify for prosecution under RICO statutes, even in the absence of a formal domestic terrorism law. “Let the DOJ and FBI shut them down,” she said. “This cannot continue.”

She also slammed elected officials like Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who she says is promoting a “day of rage” against Tesla to coincide with her birthday. “They are inciting riots and insurrection,” Pirro said. “They must face consequences.”

Responding to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ comment that the attacks were “outrageous” but not necessarily terrorism, Pirro agreed Americans have a right to protest—but drew a hard line. “None of this is constitutional. None of it is legal. And unless there are consequences, it will only get worse.”