Sen. Mike Lee: Unelected Judges Are Blocking Trump’s Agenda

A legal battle is unfolding over whether unelected judges can obstruct the Trump administration’s efforts to rein in federal spending. A Rhode Island judge, John J. McConnell, ordered the administration to unfreeze funds, prompting conservatives to argue that this is judicial overreach. Utah Senator Mike Lee responded, stating that liberal judges are using the courts to block policies they oppose.

Liberal Judges Turn to the Courts After Losing Elections

Sen. Mike Lee, a former Supreme Court law clerk, stated that the Trump administration will win on the merits of this case and others like it. He noted that the executive branch has the authority to make these decisions and that efforts to halt spending are legally justified. However, he pointed out that when Democrats lose in elections and public opinion, they turn to the courts in an attempt to delay policies.

“They lost elections, and now they’re trying to win through litigation,” Lee said. “They’re selecting liberal judges to slow the process.”

Advertisement

The senator emphasized that these lawsuits serve as delay tactics rather than legitimate legal challenges. He stressed that Trump’s team is acting within the law, and these rulings will eventually be overturned. However, he acknowledged that the delays could create setbacks and frustration for the administration.

Courts Cannot Undo the 2024 Election

Lee also addressed concerns over how a single district judge could issue nationwide injunctions that halt a president’s agenda. While appellate courts can intervene, the process takes time. This delay allows liberal judges to obstruct policies even if they are ultimately ruled lawful. He suggested that the Department of Justice should consider extraordinary legal measures, such as seeking a writ of mandamus or taking the case directly to the Supreme Court.

“These judges are overstepping,” Lee stated. “They lack the authority to undo the election of November 2024.”

Advertisement

The senator criticized the fact that the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which would hear this case, has no Republican-appointed judges. He argued that this raises concerns about fairness and whether the administration will receive an unbiased hearing. However, he remained confident that if necessary, the Trump administration could take its case to the Supreme Court and win.

“This is a delay tactic,” Lee reiterated. “But the law is on our side, and we will win.”

The battle over judicial overreach is shaping up to be a key issue in the Trump administration’s second term. As legal fights continue, conservatives are calling for reforms to prevent unelected judges from blocking policies that voters have mandated. For now, Trump’s team remains committed to pushing back against judicial interference and ensuring its agenda moves forward.

Advertisement